Comparatif des ventes DC pour Février :
http://www.comicsbeat.com/2010/04/01...february-2010/
L'équivalent Marvel :
http://www.comicsbeat.com/2010/03/31...february-2010/
Au passage, une information qui relativise un peu le faible score de
Siege #1 :
|
Citation: |
|
|
|
|
So a more likely explanation is a theory which was floated in the comments section last month. SIEGE #1 was partially returnable (albeit under limited conditions). Diamond may have scaled back its sales to reflect that promotion. They’ve done this in the past for comics which were solicited on a returnable basis. The logic, presumably, is that retailers will order more copies of a returnable book because there’s less risk in doing so; therefore, the chart needs to be adjusted to avoid comparing apples with oranges. |
|
|
|
|